San Francisco, CAMale 28 years old
About Me:I’m not what you think I am. By which I mean I am. Wait,
what?
The 2007 season wasn’t exactly kind to the AFC West. The Raiders
showed some early signs of life before they realized they were the
Raiders. Meanwhile, the Chiefs dropped their last nine games and the
Broncos were a lethargic 7-9. The one team from the division that made
the playoffs, the Chargers, spent most of the season as a completely
schizophrenic group that would sometimes look like the powerhouse AFC
team it had been in the past and other weeks would look like a
complete mess. Norv Turner was seemingly on the hot seat every other
week. Not exactly an ideal situation for a division leading team.
The one consolation for the AFC West was that in the 2007 playoffs the
Chargers went to Indy and turned Peyton Manning back into what he’s
spent most of his career as – a quarterback who can’t win big games.
They also turned in a rather heroic performance during the AFC title
game against the Patriots, led by Philip Rivers who was playing on a
torn ACL. Antonio Gates was also limited by an injury. But the real
issue during that game was LT, who sat out the majority of the game
with an injury and was questioned over and over again about his
decision to pack it in while Rivers played on one leg. Will we see
another poor regular season from the AFC West as a collective group,
only to have one of the teams make a surge in the playoffs? Let’s get
to the predictions. 4. Oakland Raiders (Predicted finish 4-12) – I’ll
make no bones about this. This team is a complete mess. But it’s a fun
mess. After last season, Al Davis supposedly sent Lane Kiffin a letter
essentially asking him to cede authority to other members of the
Raiders staff so that Kiffin would be a coach in name only. Kiffin
reportedly refused to sign. So that’s the background between the coach
and owner. When you combine that with the fact that Davis wants to win
immediately, and this team really needs to develop young players this
year, I wouldn’t be surprised to see some blowup between Kiffin and
Davis before season’s end. But aside from that, this year we’ll get
to see JaMarcus Russell at the helm for the full year. He really is
the total package if he’s working hard and committed, and he seems to
have had a good offseason by staying in shape. Only problem is he
doesn’t have much of anyone to throw to except Javon Walker. Ronald
Curry, if healthy, is decent, but he’s not exactly a stellar #2
receiver. Probably the best thing Russell has going for him as a young
QB is that he has a very talented backfield to hand the ball off to.
Justin Fargas had a dynamite second half for the Raiders last year
which will also help take the burden off of Darren McFadden. The other
good thing is that Fargas and McFadden provide two different styles of
running to keep defenses off guard. Fargas is a straight north/south
power back despite his small frame and McFadden is obviously a burner.
As for the Raiders defense, it’s always been the one solid thing
despite these past few horrendous seasons. The question has always
been, can the offense match them in any way shape or form? Probably
not this year, but a little bit down the line it’s more than possible.
3. Kansas City Chiefs (5-11) – This is supposedly a rebuilding year
for the Chiefs, but I’m not exactly sure what they’re rebuilding
towards. I’m not a fan of Brody Croyle at all (although I am of his
wife) and while Dwayne Bowe had a nice rookie season last year, I keep
wondering if Croyle will be able to get him the ball consistently this
year. But probably the biggest problem for the Chiefs is this. If
they’re in a rebuilding year, and their two best players and
headliners are veterans Tony Gonzalez and Larry Johnson, will both
those guys get upset as the season heads into the toilet? Johnson was
rumored to be pushing for a trade last year because of the team’s
struggles, and while Gonzalez has always been a consumate pro, I have
to wonder how long he’ll want to stick it out with this squad that
isn’t going anywhere fast. At least we’ll get to see how Glenn
Dorsey does on the defensive side of the ball, but let’s be honest,
this defense blows. They didn’t have a single pro bowl defensive
player from 1999 to 2006. And their only pro bowler last year, Jared
Allen, got traded to the Vikings. When you combine all of this with
another year of Herm Edwards at the helm, who may be the worst clock
manager in the game after Andy Reid, expect it to be another long
season in KC. I guarantee you Edwards will cost the Chiefs at least
one game, maybe two. Which is why instead of having them go 7-9, which
they could do, I have them going 5-11. 2. Denver Broncos (10-6) – The
Broncos disappointing 2007 season is best described using Jay Cutler
as an example. Cutler has all the talent in the world, but looked
sluggish and lethargic most of last season, just like his team.
However, there was a reason for that. Cutler was diagnosed with Type 1
diabetes in the offseason making him one of only a handful of NFL
players to ever play with the disease. Luckily for Cutler, in today’s
day and age, he’s now able to get the necessary treatment where his
diabetes shouldn’t be a problem this season at all. Hopefully, like
Cutler, the rest of the team will be injected with new life. And even
though Cutler and his primary target Brandon Marshall had some words
with each other during the offseason, Marshall seems motivated this
year. After all, , and that’s after he serves a one game suspension.
Personally, I think we’re much more likely to see Marshall get hit
with another domestic violence charge than catch 140 passes, but I
like his enthusiasm. The big problem for the Broncos is on the
defensive side of the ball. They were 30th against the run last year
and haven’t exactly made any moves that’ll change that. They have a
rough schedule to start out, but the second half of their season is
fairly light. 1. San Diego Chargers (12-4)- On paper, this is the
third best team in the AFC behind the Patriots and Colts. The only
question is, will that happen on the football field as well? Norv
Turner earned a reprieve last season by making it to the AFC
Championship, something Marty Schottenheimer couldn’t do, but if
Turner continues to oversee a turbulent and inconsistent ship in San
Diego, things could get ugly in a hurry. I hate to say it, but the
biggest question about this team is Turner, plain and simple. That’s
because San Diego is capable of being explosive on both sides of the
ball. San Diego still has LT, who I consider the best all around back
in football (he’s much more versatile than Adrian Peterson) and having
Chris Chambers at wide receiver for a full season will be huge for
Phillip Rivers. Although I’ve never been sold on Rivers, and think San
Diego never should have let Drew Brees go, the toughness and tenacity
that Rivers showed in the AFC Championship clearly earned him tons of
respect in the locker room and has made him a clear team leader. And
while he may still look like he’s shotputting his throws, Rivers is
certainly capable of taking this team far. On the defensive side,
whether Shawne Merriman plays or not doesn’t really matter. If he
plays, he’ll suck because of the injury, and if he’s not playing, then
he obviously won’t be on the field. While he’s a huge loss on the
defensive side of the ball, San Diego has plenty of defensive weapons
to at least keep the loss of Merriman from being a crippling blow.
Lastly, since LT is 29, and may not have more than a few good seasons
left, I expect him to have a monster year. This could be San Diego’s
last shot to win a Super Bowl. They’d definitely be an underdog, but
hey, we all know what the Giants did last year.
I forsee only 3 wins for the lowly Chiefs. I’d say the Raiders can win
at least 6, Broncos I doubt go over .500. Chargers win it easily
again.
We’re a little short in the WR area right now, but everything else is
solid. Super Bowls are won with great defense and strong running
games…Shawne Merriman should sit the season out because our LB depth
is solid. The CRO is back and the Chargers secondary gives nightmares
to opposing QBs…The schedule looks good too. INDY and the PATS have
to come to Qualcomm in 2008, and 5 of our last 8 games are at Home as
well. I’m hoping for 12-4, but Chargers fans won’t rest until we can
win a Super Bowl.
WBK72 wrote:
We’re a little short in the WR area right now, but everything else is
solid. Super Bowls are won with great defense and strong running
games…Shawne Merriman should sit the season out because our LB depth
is solid. The CRO is back and the Chargers secondary gives nightmares
to opposing QBs…The schedule looks good too. INDY and the PATS have
to come to Qualcomm in 2008, and 5 of our last 8 games are at Home as
well. I’m hoping for 12-4, but Chargers fans won’t rest until we can
win a Super Bowl.
(Edited 09/03/08 5:46PM by RenegadeLG)
On what kind of paper is San Diego the third best team in the AFC?
Considering their best player on either side of the ball is one
misstep from catastrophic injury, the fact that LT isn’t completely
healthy himself, and above all the fact that their Quaterback is one
of the most combustible morons in the game – the paper on which
they’re so highly touted must be of the toilet variety. I’ll wipe to
that. This article would have looked nice before last season, but
with Beast Mode now only missing one game look for the Chargers to
crash and burn Week 2 and the wheels on the bandwagon to come rolling
off. I hope Ryan Clady goes low on Merriman and does the lights out
dance over his crumpled corpse.
RenegadeLG wrote:
On what kind of paper is San Diego the third best team in the AFC?
Considering their best player on either side of the ball is one
misstep from catastrophic injury, the fact that LT isn’t completely
healthy himself, and above all the fact that their Quaterback is one
of the most combustible morons in the game – the paper on which
they’re so highly touted must be of the toilet variety. I’ll wipe to
that. This article would have looked nice before last season, but
with Beast Mode now only missing one game look for the Chargers to
crash and burn Week 2 and the wheels on the bandwagon to come rolling
off. I hope Ryan Clady goes low on Merriman and does the lights out
dance over his crumpled corpse.
They have to be the 4th at the worst in the AFC. The only teams that
look better are the Pats, Colts, and Jaguars.
(Edited 09/03/08 5:50PM by RenegadeLG) MrNFL wrote:
They have to be the 4th at the worst in the AFC. The only teams that
look better are the Pats, Colts, and Jaguars.
Preseason predictions in any sport are retarded, but especially so
when they favor a team teetering on a complete meltdown. But if we’re
going to play that game, I’d take Pittsburgh over them, too. I’m not
going to lock myself into a Denver AFC West Championship even though
it’s a much likelier possibility than ESPN and similar misinformed
outlets want to accept (#23? lawlz), but don’t be surprised when
Denver and San Diego’s second matchup decides the division.
RenegadeLG wrote:
Preseason predictions in any sport are retarded, but especially so
when they favor a team teetering on a complete meltdown. But if we’re
going to play that game, I’d take Pittsburgh over them, too. I’m not
going to lock myself into a Denver AFC West Championship even though
it’s a much likelier possibility than ESPN and similar misinformed
outlets want to accept (#23? lawlz), but don’t be surprised when
Denver and San Diego’s second matchup decides the division.
Ben has great ‘escapability’ and it’s not like Mendenhaal was running
behind NFL-caliber O-Lineman in college. He creates on the fly. And
yes, that matters, because he will be the feature back fairly early
on. You’re clearly banking on another ESPN-headed myth that losing
Alan Faneca is going to destroy that offense. Alan Faneca was a nice
addition for the Jets, but he’s now on the decline side of the
proverbial hill and it was smart of the Steelers to let him go.
Heath Miller and Matt Spaeth are two of the best blocking TEs in the
game, they will supplement the bookends just fine. Pittsburgh’s
lethal schedule will be their biggest detriment, but yeah – on paper –
I like them a lot better than the Chargers. So does anybody that
subscribes to the fact that there isn’t a more important position than
Quarterback. Big Ben is world’s ahead of Phillip Rivers, and PIT’s QB
on defense, Polamalu, is a lot more likely to contribute than SD’s QB
of D who is working on 1.5 legs at best.
(Edited 09/03/08 6:12PM by RenegadeLG)
And who are these mythical weapons on defense besides Castillo? Their
defense sucks and the guys that do make plays do so because everybody
is keying on Merriman. There’s also that whole deal with having the
worst corps of receivers in the game. Even if you want to count Gates
as a receiver, he’s hobbled. LOSING MICHAEL TURN WAS HUGE. Darren
Sproles is going to get stepped on eventually. Nate Kaeding is a choke
artist. Etc. Etc. They’re swiss cheese.
RenegadeLG wrote:
Ben has great ‘escapability’ and it’s not like Mendenhaal was running
behind NFL-caliber O-Lineman in college. He creates on the fly. And
yes, that matters, because he will be the feature back fairly early
on. You’re clearly banking on another ESPN-headed myth that losing
Alan Faneca is going to destroy that offense. Alan Faneca was a nice
addition for the Jets, but he’s now on the decline side of the
proverbial hill and it was smart of the Steelers to let him go.
Heath Miller and Matt Spaeth are two of the best blocking TEs in the
game, they will supplement the bookends just fine. Pittsburgh’s
lethal schedule will be their biggest detriment, but yeah – on paper –
I like them a lot better than the Chargers. So does anybody that
subscribes to the fact that there isn’t a more important position than
Quarterback. Big Ben is world’s ahead of Phillip Rivers, and PIT’s QB
on defense, Polamalu, is a lot more likely to contribute than SD’s QB
of D who is working on 1.5 legs at best.
How is that an ESPN myth, ESPN would have to first pay attention to
offensive lineman. That line was AWFUL WITH one of the best lineman in
football, and they didn’t do ANYTHING to improve that line. They’ll
give up over 50 sacks again, and I wouldn’t be shocked at all if that
leads to injury issues. And remember, the Quarterback is only as
good as the guys around him, and the line is the most important of
those guys. The Chargers have a very good line, the Steelers line is
terrible. The Steelers have a better D, and better skill positions,
but that line, and a tougher schedule hurts the Steelers a lot.
RenegadeLG wrote:
And who are these mythical weapons on defense besides Castillo? Their
defense sucks and the guys that do make plays do so because everybody
is keying on Merriman. There’s also that whole deal with having the
worst corps of receivers in the game. Even if you want to count Gates
as a receiver, he’s hobbled. LOSING MICHAEL TURN WAS HUGE. Darren
Sproles is going to get stepped on eventually. Nate Kaeding is a choke
artist. Etc. Etc. They’re swiss cheese.
Jamal Williams is the best nose tackle in football, and they have a
strong secondary. The Steelers do have a better defense, and the
Chargers in NO WAY have the worst receivers in football. Titans and
Dolphins are FAR worse. And I think Turner is highly over-rated,
he’s not even the best back in Atlanta.
RenegadeLG wrote:
On what kind of paper is San Diego the third best team in the AFC?
Considering their best player on either side of the ball is one
misstep from catastrophic injury, the fact that LT isn’t completely
healthy himself, and above all the fact that their Quaterback is one
of the most combustible morons in the game – the paper on which
they’re so highly touted must be of the toilet variety. I’ll wipe to
that. This article would have looked nice before last season, but
with Beast Mode now only missing one game look for the Chargers to
crash and burn Week 2 and the wheels on the bandwagon to come rolling
off. I hope Ryan Clady goes low on Merriman and does the lights out
dance over his crumpled corpse.
Still bitter about having your QB called a “Big Baby” I see…1st of
all, the best player on either side of the ball is not “Lights
Out”…The Chargers best player is without a doubt LT and it could
quite possibly be Antonio Gates. The Chargers have so much depth at
LB, so Merriman’s Injury will only hurt himself. Stephen Cooper and
Matt Wilhelm are 2 guys who can dominate the Mid-LB area. Shaun
Phillips is just a machine at the OLB, and the hardest hitter on the
Chargers D may just be LB Brandon Siler. The guy is 6′ 2” 240lbs and
has been playing on Special Teams cracking heads waiting for his
opportunity. How would this article have looked if it was written on
XMAS EVE 2007 after the Chargers spanked the Broncos for the 2nd time
with a 2-game composite score of 64-6? Do you really think Jay Cutler
will have figured it out by Sept 14? Bring Ryan Clady’s B.S. to
“Light’sOut”…All day, All Day….
Whoever wrote this article is funny. Al Davis doesn’t play on the
field, but he can tell people to fumble, break legs, and even call his
own team stupid. Not even close. What makes or breaks a team, is what
they do on the field. Find it funny that this guy thinks the Raiders
will only win 4 games this year, considering they’re playing the 3rd
easiest schedule. And of this year’s opponents, the Raiders Split with
the Broncos and Chiefs, then beat up on a punchless Dolphins team. Go
look up the schedule. Oakland’s only real competition is going to be
the Pats, the Chargers, maybe the Jets, but doubtful, and maybe Tampa,
if they’re not resting the starters. Lastly, banking on Denver to win
because they have Shanahan, is like saying the Raiders will lose
because Al Davis is in charge. Shanahan was there last year too, and
since 1999, they’ve been flat. Half the time, knocked out in the first
round of the playoffs, other half, didn’t make it at all. One time,
they broke through against the Pats, only to lose the next round….no
hope there. Lastly, chargers. Same problem, running away from
history. When Merriman goes out with his leg injury, be sure to thank
Norv Turner for it.
RenegadeLG wrote:
Preseason predictions in any sport are retarded, but especially so
when they favor a team teetering on a complete meltdown. But if we’re
going to play that game, I’d take Pittsburgh over them, too. I’m not
going to lock myself into a Denver AFC West Championship even though
it’s a much likelier possibility than ESPN and similar misinformed
outlets want to accept (#23? lawlz), but don’t be surprised when
Denver and San Diego’s second matchup decides the division.
Preseason predictions are just that…Predictions. You said, “I’m not
going to lock myself into a Denver AFC West Championship blah blah
blah but it’s a much likelier possibility than ESPN blah blah blah.”
That my friend is a PREDICTION. If you think Week 2 will decide the
Division, then I can’t really help you with that one…I do know that
Dre’ Bly and Champ Bailey teamed up will be a scary sight for opposing
QB’s, and I do know that Brandon Marshall is a “Phenom” who I would
love to have on the Chargers. But, there will be no “Meltdown” in SD.
In Chargers land we already know how it feels to be “Heavily Favored”
only to lose when it counts. 12-4 in 2004 didn’t win the Super Bowl,
and neither did 14-2 in 2006. Heck, last year we were 11-5 and just
about snuck our way into the Super Bowl. Maybe it would be better if
the Chargers went 10-6 because they play better as the “Underdogs”…
I know it wasn’t fun for you watching Clinton Hart body slam your boy
Cutler on the Safety Blitz XMAS EVE…You guys will be back in
Qualcomm around XMAS time again this season, so you better get that
wish-list letter out to SANTA CLAUS as soon as possible…
Actually, Dre Bly is terrible, so the fact that you don’t follow the
team too closely makes me worry less about your prediction. I said
their SECOND MATCHUP would decide the division, not week 2. Although
San Diego will start the season 0-2. The Padres suck. You don’t have
much to cheer for down there, at least professionally. For that reason
I want to just let it go and let you live in denial. I’ve never known
what it is to live in a city with not a single competitive team, and I
know you don’t want to go back to that place. Good luck either way.
BTW, Phillip Rivers calling anybody a baby is sofa king hilarious.
That guy is an inbred douche.
scottraven wrote:
Whoever wrote this article is funny. Al Davis doesn’t play on the
field, but he can tell people to fumble, break legs, and even call his
own team stupid. Not even close. What makes or breaks a team, is what
they do on the field. Find it funny that this guy thinks the Raiders
will only win 4 games this year, considering they’re playing the 3rd
easiest schedule. And of this year’s opponents, the Raiders Split with
the Broncos and Chiefs, then beat up on a punchless Dolphins team. Go
look up the schedule. Oakland’s only real competition is going to be
the Pats, the Chargers, maybe the Jets, but doubtful, and maybe Tampa,
if they’re not resting the starters. Lastly, banking on Denver to win
because they have Shanahan, is like saying the Raiders will lose
because Al Davis is in charge. Shanahan was there last year too, and
since 1999, they’ve been flat. Half the time, knocked out in the first
round of the playoffs, other half, didn’t make it at all. One time,
they broke through against the Pats, only to lose the next round….no
hope there. Lastly, chargers. Same problem, running away from
history. When Merriman goes out with his leg injury, be sure to thank
Norv Turner for it.
Wake me up when the Raiders win more than 5 games. The team is
pathetic. Let’s just do what you suggested and check their schedule
which is supposedly so “easy.” They play their divisional rivals 6
times obviously, and they’re guaranteed to lose at least 4 of them.
They might split with the Broncos and Chiefs, but 2-4 is the best
they’ll do in their own division. They don’t have a rats chance in
hell against the Bucs, Pats, and Saints outside of their division.
With Favre leading the Jets, they’ll most likely lose that game too
because while they’re just as bad, having Favre gives them the ability
to beat a team as crummy as they are, a la your Raiders. They’re just
as bad as Baltimore, so that game is a toss up. Miami falls into the
same boat as Baltimore, as does Atlanta. They’ll lose to Carolina too
along with Houston and Buffalo, who aren’t incredible teams by any
means, but are still much better than the Raiders. That’s 11
guaranteed losses, maybe 2 wins in the division, and 3 games that
could go either way. They’re 5-11 at best.
Raiders splitting with the Broncos? Maybe if Curry has 8 more of those
58-inch vertical snow catches.