The current NBA playoff format is antiquated and unfair. Casey Michel
gives five reasons why it’s time for a change.
Contrary to what some may say out there, good sports writing still
exists. Ian Thomsen, the balding Sports Illustrated sage—he and
TrueHoop’s Henry Abbott should form a club—can usually be
counted on to donate his time toward sound NBA observations. His
writing in the magazine is some of the finest out there, but, as I am
a poor college student, si.com has become my bastion of Thomsen
musings.
So during an offseason whose highlight has—for me—been
Rudy Fernandez in-your-eyeing Dwight Howard, I decided to check out
Thomsen’s archives, scouring the links for any tidbits that may help
me in future discussion.
But as the capstone of last week’s commentary, Thomsen threw his
weight behind something which, as a Gen-Y’er and thus a purveyor
of equal opportunity, I simply cannot agree with—keeping the NBA
playoff format.
As a matter of full disclosure, I guess it’s necessary to point
out that, yes, there is a Blazers sign posted next to my door, but my
stance toward restructuring the playoffs was in no way affected by my
Portland partiality. Promise.
Therefore, since Thomsen so graciously gave us “,” I will
attempt to counter these arguments with a five-some of my own.
The MLB doesn’t do it. The NFL doesn’t do it. The NHL (if
anyone still cares) doesn’t do it. So why, my friends, should
the final participant in the Big Four deign to cobble all playoff
teams into one bracket?
Only a fool or a liar would claim that the March Madness, with the
possible exception of that lone play-in game, is a failure. From
Selection Sunday to the Final Four, the excitement of this lone
bracket is akin to the feeling Waterloo’s outcome brought
Britain.
The teams are dispersed evenly, without regard to conference
or—with the possible exception of the top seeds—locale.
Only the 65 best teams are welcomed into the pearly gates of the
Madness, and only the top will eventually find themselves lauded by
Digger Phelps and Bob Knight.
No, I am not saying that the NBA should mimic all the attributes of
the Greatest Spectacle on Earth—the less Dick Vitale, the better
for my eardrums. I’m just saying that The Administration should cull
March Madness’ best aspects and apply them to NBA playoffs.
As Thomsen says, a slight tweaking of the schedule would need to
happen in order for the “equality” aspect of this to work.
Stern has obviously shown that he is willing to shake things
up—relocating into six divisions just went down a couple years
ago, murmurs of European/Russian expansion continue to bubble and
fester, and the guy approved a team moving from a top-15 market
to—and I still can’t believe this is true—Oklahoma.
Granted, pooling all the teams would be a reversal of current trends,
but I never understood where this fixation with division winners came
from. Ok, well, maybe I do—more playoff games equate more money,
especially ticket prices that have gone up by more than double-digit
percentages in the last 10 years.
Baseball started the craze in 1995, and the other three soon followed
suit. Before you know it, Atlantic Division Champions banners joined
the rafters alongside the plethora of World Champion flags in Boston
Garden.
But if I could use the 2008 playoffs as Example A, the divisional
structure has created some strange, Twilight Zone-esque situations.
What kind of world is it where a higher seed—the
Jazz—cedes home-court advantage to a lower seed?
As the first-round series wound toward Game Six, the Utah-Houston
matchup had easily become the most intriguing competition out
West—if only because Houston would have hosted the deciding Game
Seven. Ian, this makes about as much sense as John McCain claiming he
invented the BlackBerry, doesn’t it?
The schedule of equality would no longer be weighted, as every team
would face the other, say, three times, for a grand total of 87 games.
Thomsen declares this method would never work because, among other
reasons, it would “ruin any hope of creating divisional or
regional rivalries.”
Really? If San Antonio and Dallas didn’t meet as often, that
rivalry would go the way of the telegraph? And are you saying that the
whims of carpetbaggers are suffice to ruining the I-5 and potential
Oden-Durant rivalries, but a sense of fairness isn’t?
Call me an idealist, but I don’t buy it. Regional rivalries will
always exist—look no further than the NL’s Brooklyn Dodgers’ and
the AL’s New York Yankees’ fights of yesteryear for proof that a glut
of regular season meetings don’t mean squat.
And don’t give me this “travel sucks” baloney. This
isn’t the post-Depression 1930s, and you are not the Boston Red
Sox catching the 9:30 train to St. Louis for a night game with the
Browns.
It is now the 21st century, a time in which a phone can turn into a TV
and anything is just a click away. As Tony Stark said in Iron Man, the
charter flights will wait on those flying, not vice versa, so quit
your whining.
Thomsen penned this article while the playoffs were in their infancy,
so he didn’t have the fortune of hindsight now available. Beyond
the claim that, based solely on record, Golden State and Portland
would have put up better fights than Atlanta and Philadelphia,
Thomsen’s claims of series being “better” or
“worse” is both trivial and irrational.
For example, he says that New Orleans vs. Cleveland would have been
“worse” than Cleveland-Washington or New Orleans-Dallas.
I’m not a betting man, but I can guarantee no one would take a
bathroom break in New Orleans Arena while LeBron James went toe-to-toe
with CP3.
And how did that Phoenix-San Antonio “whoever-wins-this-series-will-
win-the-West” struggle turn out? With the exception of the ESPN
Classic-worthy Game One, the Suns turned out to be terribly over-
hyped, and Steve Nash’s inability to properly dish the ball
meant that the series was sealed long before it was over.
Thomsen’s arbitrary opinions are null and void, and fail to
count on upstarts—like Philadelphia and Atlanta—putting up
a legitimate fight.
No one likes predictability in sports. Fans, sports writers, and Pete
Rose et al. would desert the realm of sports if Goliath always stomped
on David. Fortunately, the games’ intangible and capricious
nature means that no one—besides the 1919 Black Sox—knows
what the coda of the show will entail.
Thomsen is right in saying that “the NBA puts on the purest
tournament of the four major leagues”—but only in the
sense that 12 of the last 13 NBA champions have been one of the top
two of their conference. However, as we saw in 2007 with Baron’s
beard-led Warriors, anything can happen come postseason.
The “quirky” factor of the NBA will remain if the most
deserving teams are let into the playoffs, but when a team has put
forward the will, fortitude, and desire through 82 grueling games,
only to see its championship hopes go up in flames due to a line-in-
the-sand setup, something does not sit well.
Since “the most qualified teams usually advance through the
playoffs because that’s how the best-of-seven series format
works in the NBA,” why would it be so terrible to actually give
everyone a fair shot?
Ok, Thomsen may be correct on this one. At the end of the rainbow lies
a nice little lottery pick for those unfortunate teams whose bubbles
burst after 82 games. But, beyond the benefits for those one or two
teams, how does this make the league better in its current format?
When I was but a middle-schooler, a mid-NBA-season Sports
Illustratedarticle ran chronicling the rise of the West (for some
reason they decided to include a piece on Bonzi Wells, but
that’s beside the point). It’s not that hard to imagine a
lazy SIeditor recycling the story, replacing a couple names here and
there, and not worrying that the fans would even bat an eye.
Why? Because, despite the Danny Ainge’s pickpocketing of former
teammate Kevin McHale, the West is more dominant than its ever been,
with nearly nine 50-plus win teams. And who knows how many the Blazers
would have gotten with Greg Oden holding down the post?
The NFL and MLB have it right in this department, rewarding the worst
teams with the best picks. But karma had its way with both Memphis and
Boston in 2007—teams that obviously tanked as the season would
down—and gave Portland and Seattle/Oklahoma City the top picks
(although it’s debatable Miami would have picked Derrick Rose during
the 2008 draft).
But as the 2007-08 regular season entered its final throes, who could
have said the teams that came within a whisper of the playoffs
wouldn’t have landed the No. 1 pick once again? With Baron Davis,
Monta Ellis, and Michael Beasley on the team, the Warriors would
undoubtedly rocket into the playoffs, leaving yet another worthy West
squad at home during May.
Chicago, with a 1.7 percent chance of earning the pole position, took
on the role of spoiler—but those minuscule odds could have just
as easily gone toward the West.
Finally, after all is said and done, Thomsen’s No. 1 reason for
keeping the current format, the point that will surely sway any and
all readers to his side, is—the strength of the fans’
complaints?
Ok. I know we’ve been called a nation of whiners (thanks,
McCain’s economic adviser!), but Thomsen wants us to be louderabout
it?
This final “argument” is actually just rehashed points
from earlier bullets, with Thomsen claiming, “It’s better to
hear from passionate and occasionally enraged fans about the current
system than to imagine the ‘improved’ system that would
take its place.” Nothing concrete here—no suggestions,
postulations, or ideas for why the playoff format should not represent
equality.
The regular season wouldn’t become “non-
descript”—at least not anymore than it already
is—and to call the potential first-round matchups less
compelling is both arbitrary and, as evidenced by the lackluster
contests out West, simply not true.
As the 2008-09 season comes to fruition, it’s time for David
Stern to get his head out of Clay Bennett’s, um, grip (no need
for bad words here) and finally step up for the good of the game.
But you are wrong about PHI, they but up a great fight and was one of
the best match-ups in the entire playoffs.
I think the NBA needs to keep the playoff format as it is because it
places more emphasis on the conferences. You want teams to play other
teams in the playoffs who they are more familiar with, and who their
fans know better.
As a Celtics fan, I wanted to see them play Cleveland and Detroit
because I knew them better and the Celtics knew them better. I
wouldn’t want the C’s to play Portland; I barely know the players on
the Blazers. I know Atlanta, Cleveland, and Detroit, down to the
players on their bench, because the Celtics played them each three or
four times during the season.
Although I disagree with Philidelphia and your Nash bashing (see
Steven Resnick’s “Top 10 Point Guards), this was a great article. It
wasn’t fair that Boston didn’t have to play some of the dominant teams
in the West, and it’s not fair to the Warriors or Blazers when they
don’t make the playoffs but are clearly better than some teams in the
East. This system needs to be changed.
Standard Messaging Rates or other charges apply. To Opt-out text STOP
to 4INFO (44636). For more information text HELP to 4INFO (44636).
Contact your carrier for more details.
Al davis raiders’s season rams kiffin
October 1, 2008WITH FAR MORE days remaining in this season than have passed, it’s a
little odd there already is so much angst in so many places.
Yes, we are only a month into this NFL season, and there are two teams
poised to fire their coaches, two teams with fingers poised over the
switch, two teams tangled in a web of disarray, bad public relations
and with little public comment from the people who make the decisions
about any of it.
Keep your eyes peeled, though, because the Oakland Raiders and St.
Louis Rams share the same bye week — a week from Sunday — and there
are many around the league who believe both team’s coaches could be
fired within hours of completing their on-field business this Sunday.
Coach Lane Kiffin, who some in the league say is scheduled to earn $2
million this year and $2 million next year, doesn’t want to quit a
team that so obviously wants to fire him. If he quits, he surrenders
his salary.
If he’s fired, the Raiders pay. Or at least Kiffin and the Raiders
hire attorneys and fight it out for the cash, with both sides waving
Kiffin’s signed contract around.
But owner Al Davis hasn’t talked to Kiffin directly during the regular
season, and some around the team say the silence stretches back to
training camp.
Kiffin tried to fire defensive coordinator Rob Ryan in the offseason
and was overruled by Davis. So, Ryan stayed, and now those two aren’t
exactly texting “BFF” back and forth to each other these days.
All this from a team that has lost at least 11 games in each of the
previous five seasons.
This from a team that has used the word “excellence” as part of its
calling card for years, when in reality it has been quite some time
since it even reached the level of not too bad.
For his part, though, Kiffin is almost in a no-lose position. The team
has played hard enough this season that, should Davis finally go
public with his displeasure with Kiffin, no other general manager or
team owner who might be interested in hiring Kiffin later would ever
hold what happened in Oakland against him.
In St. Louis, things are bad enough for coach Scott Linehan that his
wife was seen crying after the 37-13 loss Sunday at Seattle.
It’s unlikely Kristen Linehan knew exactly what her husband was
getting into when he took the job, but the Rams have been known all
over the league for their organizational infighting since Mike Martz
was the team’s coach.
When Martz was fired, there were people with the Rams who portrayed
the mercurial Martz as the problem, but the problems certainly run
deeper than that.
The Rams are last, or headed that way, in virtually every statistical
category the league has to offer. They also are facing more than a
little public questioning after the Broncos’ 3-0 start over why the
Rams were the ones who let the Broncos move up in the 2006 draft so
they could take Jay Cutler with the 11th pick.
The Rams then took cornerback Tye Hill in their slot. And he just
happens to be one of the players Linehan has benched in recent days as
he tries to save his job.
But Linehan also made the official panic-setting-in move when he
benched quarterback Marc Bulger on Tuesday. Bulger hasn’t accomplished
much behind center this season, other than trying to survive behind an
offensive line that so far has been far more screen door than line.
Bulger is 31 years old and battered, having been sacked 97 times in
his past 31 starts. He’s also the guy the Rams signed to a $65 million
contract extension that now includes a guaranteed $7 million salary
for this season, an atmospheric number for a backup.
His replacement? The one Linehan has selected to help turn the
epically big tide in all of this? Trent Green, who turned 38 in July
and has missed significant time recently with concussions.
Linehan also now looks like he’s throwing the mess in Bulger’s lap
since he has benched a quarterback who has indeed had some wobbles
this year but also currently has a higher passer rating than Peyton
Manning, David Garrard, Derek Anderson, Matt Hasselbeck, Matt Schaub
or Carson Palmer.
The Raiders (1-2) face the San Diego Chargers on Sunday before heading
into their bye week. The Chargers have won nine consecutive games
against the Raiders, dating to the 2003 season, when Bill Callahan was
still the Oakland coach.
The Rams face 3-0 Buffalo on Sunday before they, too, head into their
bye. They haven’t won a game since Dec. 2 of last season, haven’t won
two games in a row since November.
They are just two teams who appear poised to be first in at least one
thing this year — firing their coaches before handing the broom to
somebody else to clean it all up.
Add your voice to those of many Hawks fans from all over the globe!
and bone up for the season with other knowledgeable fanatics!
Tags:bye week, calling card, coach lane, defensive coordinator, disarray, displeasure, fingers, five seasons, hasn, lane kiffin, nfl season, oakland raiders, offseason, public comment, public relations, rob ryan, salary, st louis rams, team owner, training camp
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »